Hmm, by the looks of things, this is now happening on a greater scale
A TB has picked up several thousand miles. The owner has found both the cache it was placed in and the one it was retrieved from.
But they haven't logged the TB - another 'cacher' retrieved and placed it in the cache, and has logged a found too - but
not on the cache they retrieved it from - but the TB owner has found that one
Both accounts logged the cache the TB is in now on the same date.
Not going to rush to accusations, but what do you think? I may be blowing this out of proportion - or am I?